🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 remains arguably the deadliest – and significant – occasions in multiple decades of violence in this area.

Within the community where events unfolded – the images of that fateful day are visible on the buildings and etched in collective memory.

A public gathering was organized on a cold but bright day in the city.

The demonstration was a protest against the policy of detention without trial – holding suspects without due process – which had been established following an extended period of unrest.

Military personnel from the Parachute Regiment killed thirteen individuals in the neighborhood – which was, and still is, a strongly republican area.

One image became particularly prominent.

Photographs showed a Catholic priest, Father Daly, using a stained with blood fabric while attempting to shield a assembly transporting a teenager, the injured teenager, who had been mortally injured.

Journalists documented extensive video on the day.

The archive contains the priest informing a reporter that troops "appeared to fire in all directions" and he was "totally convinced" that there was no provocation for the shooting.

The narrative of what happened wasn't accepted by the original examination.

The initial inquiry found the soldiers had been fired upon initially.

Throughout the resolution efforts, Tony Blair's government set up a fresh examination, in response to advocacy by family members, who said the first investigation had been a inadequate investigation.

That year, the report by the investigation said that on balance, the paratroopers had discharged weapons initially and that zero among the individuals had presented danger.

The then head of state, David Cameron, apologised in the government chamber – saying deaths were "unjustified and unjustifiable."

Authorities started to examine the incident.

One former paratrooper, referred to as Soldier F, was prosecuted for killing.

He was charged over the fatalities of James Wray, in his twenties, and 26-year-old another victim.

The accused was also accused of trying to kill several people, additional persons, further individuals, Michael Quinn, and an unnamed civilian.

Remains a legal order protecting the veteran's privacy, which his attorneys have claimed is necessary because he is at danger.

He testified the examination that he had solely shot at persons who were possessing firearms.

The statement was rejected in the official findings.

Information from the investigation would not be used immediately as testimony in the criminal process.

During the trial, the defendant was hidden from public behind a blue curtain.

He addressed the court for the opening instance in court at a proceeding in that month, to reply "innocent" when the allegations were presented.

Relatives of those who were killed on the incident journeyed from Londonderry to the judicial building every day of the trial.

One relative, whose sibling was killed, said they were aware that hearing the case would be painful.

"I visualize the events in my recollection," he said, as we walked around the primary sites discussed in the proceedings – from the location, where Michael was fatally wounded, to the adjoining the courtyard, where the individual and William McKinney were died.

"It reminds me to where I was that day.

"I helped to carry my brother and put him in the medical transport.

"I relived every moment during the testimony.

"Notwithstanding having to go through the process – it's still meaningful for me."